This is an analogy, not a claim of mathematical proof. A few sampled positions can miss a difference; six checks can
share the same blind spot. But a giant change — a new feature, a refactor, or a generated patch — is too large for one
person to understand all at once. The practical response is to make several deliberately different measurements of
it. Each view asks whether the change still agrees with a different contract: the language, the conventions, the
behavior, the learner, the reader, and the person who must act on it.
The point is not to slow down vibe coding into bureaucracy. It is to make rapid iteration safe enough to keep: generate
quickly, then make the result survive several kinds of contact with reality.